EMF SR 7 Quantifying Oil Disruption Risks Through Expert Judgment
Special ReportAuthors
Hillard G. Huntington - Stanford University
Antje Kann
John P. Weyant - Stanford University
Published by
Stanford University, 1997
This report describes a methodology
for extracting and quantifying expert views on the likelihood of at
least one oil disruption over the next ten years. Experts attended a
series of workshops held by the Energy Modeling Forum to develop a risk
assessment framework for use in understanding key uncertainties in
thinking about energy security. This framework draws on decision and
risk analysis, methodologies which have been used to analyze a
different range of topics where uncertainty is important and where
objective and rigorous standards can hold up to scrutiny by a variety
of affected parties.
The approach identified uncertain events in three broad areas that
spanned political and military conditions, oil shortfalls, and
potential supply offsets. Participating experts evaluated uncertainties
associated with a number of conditions that could influence the
magnitude of an oil disruption. These lower-level uncertainties are
then combined mathematically to derive an overall assessment of the
likelihood of oil disruptions of varying magnitudes. The study
addressed both short (less than 6 months) and long (more than 6 months)
disruptions.



