Event Details:
Location
Snowmass, CO
United States
Week 1
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
- John Weyant, Stanford University
Underlying Questions to be addressed in each session:
- How good is the emissions data and can it be improved?
- What are the major uncertainties?
- How realistic are the mitigation estimates?
- How can the degree of compliance be improved?
- What are the major uncertainties for emissions and mitigation estimates?
- Is the current resolution (spatial, sectorial, and technological) of the IAMs sufficient to address key impacts at global and regional scale?
- How important is this for RF/Temp/Precipitation and IAMs in general?
Session #1: Short Lived Climate Forcers/Air Quality
Steering Committee: S. Smith, Z. Klimont, G. Luderer, D. van Vuuren, J. Weyant
Presentation of EMF 30 current progress, results and future plans
Short review of related community projects
- John Weyant, Stanford University
Integrating SLCF futures in climate research
- Joeri Rogelj, IIASA, Austria
Methane: Mitigation, MACs, and Reality
Representing methane emission mitigation in current IAMs and their scenarios?
- Detlef van Vuuren, PBL, Netherlands
EPA MAC Curves and voluntary programs
- Marcus Sarofim, U.S. EPA
- Zig Klimont, IIASA, Austria
BC from transportation: how much now and future?
Overview of transport sector in IAMs, mode and fuel shifts
- Steve Smith, JGCRI/PNNL
Black carbon emissions from transportation where we stand
- Mike Walsh, International Consultant
BC from transportation: How much now, and future?
- Valerie Karplus, MIT
Wednesday, July 22, 2015
Health impacts: epidemiology to exposure
What do we know about health impacts of ozone and particulates and how do we know this?
- Bart Ostro, University of California, Davis and California EPA
From emissions to exposure, use of impact functions
- Jason West, University of North Carolina
- Rita van Dingenen (remotely), Air and Climate Unit, Europa, Italy
Residential sector: fuel use and other drivers of emissions
- Zig Klimont, IIASA, Austria
Top-Down Monitoring of Household Energy Use
- Heather Adair-Rohani (remotely), World Health Organization
Residential sector: emissions and mitigation potential
Presentation
- Nicholas Lam, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Presentation
- Ilse Ruiz-Mercado, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Air pollution policy in Asia
Presentation
- Valerie Karplus, MIT
Thursday, July 23, 2015
Session #2: Lessons from the CMU Center on Environmental Decision Making Center
Steering Committee: Ines Azevedo, Granger Morgan
Overview of >25 years of HDGC, CDMC and CEDM
- Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University
Today’s session will provide an overview of more than twenty-five years of climate and energy research conducted in three successive NSF supported centers that have been anchored at Carnegie Mellon University:
The center for Integrated Study of the Human Dimensions of Global Change (HDGC) from 1995-2003: http://hdgc.epp.cmu.edu
The Climate Decision Making Center (CDMC) from 2003 to 2010:
The Climate and Energy Decision Making Center (CEDM) from 2010 to 2020: http://cedmcenter.org
Scientific uncertainty, subjective expert judgment, and heterogeneity have played key roles in shaping the work of all three of these centers. The day will begin by tracing the evolution of the work from a central focus on integrated assessment models at the global scale to a focus on distributed decision-making; a move from a global to a more local focus, and a transition from a century-scale perspective to a more decadal perspective. These more local studies (where policies are enacted and impacts occur) have significant lessons for IA modelers. Hence, the balance of the day will be devoted to reports of results and insights from a number of recent research projects
SUB SESSION 1: Uncertainty in energy efficiency
Part 1: Technologies, Strategies, behavior and policy
- Ines Azevedo, Carnegie Mellon University
Part 2: Technologies, Strategies, behavior and policy
- Alex Davis, Carnegie Mellon University
Decision Support for implementing the EPA Clean Power Plan Prosed Rule
- Jeff Anderson, Carnegie Mellon University
Marginal emissions factors, health and climate change co benefits and trade-offs
- Inez Azevedo, Carnegie Mellon University
Insights from 25 years of work on forecasting and expert elicitation
- Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University
SUB SESSION 2: Transitioning to a low carbon economy
Part I: Insights from the RenewElec Project
- Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University
Part 2: Insights from ITC and BC’s Climate Policy
- Hadi Dowlatabadi, University British Columbia (remotely)
- Dalia Patino-Echeverri , Duke University
Reflections on Research and Governance with Albedo Modification
- Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University
Insights from our Experience in Building and Using ICAMs
- Hadi Dowlatabadi, University British Columbia
Muddling through on climate policy: good, but not good enough to avoid the risk of dead ends
- Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University
Friday, July 24, 2015
Session #3 Approaches to uncertainty in IAM analyses, including whether or not community scenarios would have probabilities attached to them
Steering Committee: Valentina Bosetti, Klaus Keller, John Weyant
Welcome & Introduction
- John Weyant, Stanford University, Valentina Bosetti, Bocconi University, Italy
Taking Stock 1 (Uncertainty Drivers and SSPs)
- Klaus Keller, Pennsylvania State University
Taking Stock 2 (MIP global sensitivity and uncertainty)
- Massimo Tavoni, FEEM, Italy
Taking Stock 3 (SCC and Uncertainty)
- David Anthoff, University of California, Berkeley
JDM perspective on science supported decision making
- David Budescu, Fordham University
Uncertainty, statistics and science supported decision making
- Peter Challenor, University of Exeter, United Kingdom
SRM as a risk management option
- Kenichi Wada, RITE-Japan
Week 2
Monday, July 27, 2015
Modeling Under Uncertainty Project (MUP) Update
Chair: Bill Nordhaus, Kenneth Gillingham, Yale University
Part I. Presentation of the results of the MUP project to date
- Bill Nordhaus and Kenneth Gillingham, Yale University
Overview, Calibration, PDFs
- Kenneth Gillingham, Yale University
- Peter Christensen, Yale University
- Bill Nordhaus, Yale University
Part II. Modeler’s Presentations
- FUND, David Anthoff, UC Berkeley
- WITCH, Valentina Bosetti, Bocconi University, Italy
- IGSM, John Reilly, MIT
- GCAM, Leon Clarke, JGCRI/PNNL
Part III. Continuation of Discussion by outside discussants
- Nebosja Nakicenovic, IIASA
- Max Tavoni, FEEM, Italy
- Klaus Keller, Penn Sate University
Tuesday, July 28, 2015
Integrated Impacts/Scenarios Session
(Steering Committee: Kate Calvin, Richard Moss, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Mike Mastrandrea, Chris Weaver, John Weyant)
Objectives:
- Advance the science of modeling climate change impacts by focusing on key challenges in different sectors. The goal is not a comprehensive review of modeling impacts, but rather a deep dive in a few specific areas.
- Facilitate interactions and understanding across research communities.
- Review and assess experience with current state of the art approaches to integrated scenario development, impacts assessment, and uncertainty analysis.
- Develop recommendations for future integrative analysis by individual modeling teams and the community as a whole. Both scientific understanding and policy (including information on research priorities) needs for scientific information will be considered.
Challenges in modeling impacts:
- LAND: the effect of climate change extremes on agriculture
- ENERGY: the effect climate change on electricity supply
- WATER: the effect of regulation on the ability to adapt to climate change
Welcome and goals for the session
- John Weyant and Kate Calvin, JGCRI/PNNL
Part 1: Overarching issues with respect to impacts
Chair: John Weyant, Stanford University
Future directions for the global impacts assessments (PICC WG2)
- Mike Mastrandrea, Near Zero/ Carnegie Institute for Science
Future directions for USA Impacts Assessments (NCA)
- Glynis Lough, U.S. Global Change Research Program
Future directions for European Impacts Assessment (PESETA)
- Juan Carlos Ciscar, European Commission, Spain
Drivers and societal conditions: SSPs and CMIP6
- Detlef van Vuuren, PBL, Netherlands
Interactions across impact sectors
- Keywan Riahi, IIASA, Austria
Interactions between impacts, adaptations and mitigation
- Karen Fisher-Vanden, Penn State University
Part 2: Challenges in modeling agriculture impacts, focusing on climate change extremes
Chair: Mike Mastrandrea, Near Zero/ Carnegie Institute for Science
Overview of agricultural impacts, including any previous work
- Tom Hertel, Purdue University
Understanding the science: What do we know from field/lab studies? What don’t we know?
- Heather McCarthy, University of Oklahoma
Representing climate & environmental conditions: How well are we equipped to model climate change extremes? How well can we improve? What are data/resolution needs?
- Travis O’Brien, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
- Alex Ruane, NASA GISS (remote)
- Kate Calvin, JGCRI/PNNL
Discussants:
- Ron Sands, USDA Economic Research Service
- Shinichiro Fujimori, NIES, Japan
- Andrew Jones, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
USGCRP Perspective
- Gary Geernaert, U.S. Department of Energy
Part 3: Challenges in modeling impacts on the water cycle, focusing on adaptation
Chair: Leon Clarke, JGCRI/PNNL
Overview of water cycle impacts, including any previous work
- David Yates, NCAR
- Sheila Olmstead, University of Texas at Austin
Representing climate & environmental conditions: How well are we equipped to model precipitation, stream flow, and stream temperature? How can we improve? What are data/resolution needs?
- David Yates, NCAR
- Richard Lammers, University of New Hampshire
Representing interactions in IA models: What is needed to include this in an IA model? How will these effects interact with energy/water/land/economy? Are other effects co-indicated
- John Reilly, MIT
Discussants:
- Jeff Arnold, University of Washington
- Jim McFarland, U.S. EPA
- Jae Edmonds, JGCRI/PNNL
Part 4: Challenges in modeling energy system impacts, focusing on electricity supply
Chair: Kate Calvin, JGCRI/PNNL
Overview of energy impacts, including any previous work
- Guido Franco, California Energy Commission
Understanding the science and representing climate & environmental conditions: What are the technical effects of climate change on electricity supply? How well are we equipped to model wind and solar? What are data/resolution needs?
- Lawrence Buja, NCAR
Representing the physical processes: How well are we equipped to model climate effects on electricity supply? How can we improve?
- Ian Kraucunas, JGCRI/PNNL
Representing interactions in IA models: What is needed to include this in an IA model? How will these effects interact with energy/water/land/economy? Are other effects co-indicated?
- Leon Clarke, JGCRI/PNNL
Discussants:
- Bob Vallario, U.S. Department of Energy
- Elmar Kriegler, PIK, Germany
- Ian Sue Wing, Boston University
Thursday, July 30, 2015
Part 5: Cross-Sectorial Technical Issues
Chair: Kate Calvin, JGCRI/PNNL
Panel of IA modelers to discuss linkages across sectors (e.g., energy, water, land, infrastructure, sea level rise, health):
- Leon Clarke, JGCRI, PNNL
- Delavane Diaz, Stanford University
- Kristi Ebi, University of Washington
- Tom Hertel, Purdue University
- John Reilly, MIT
Uncertainty Frameworks
- Massimo Tavoni, FEEM
Providing probabilistic climate information (or not)
- Valentina Bossetti, Bocconi University, Italy
Special talk on energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S.
- Jim Sweeney, Stanford University
Friday, July 31, 2015
Part 6: Future directions, including recommendations for future integrative analysis by individual modeling teams and the IAM community as a whole
Chair: Richard Moss, JGCRI/PNNL
Research Needs and Opportunities Panel: What did we learn this week? What areas are interesting for future research?
- Ted Cope, NGA
- Bryan Mignone or Haroon Kheshgi, ExxonMobil
- Jim McFarland, U.S. EPA
- Jonathan Pershing, U.S. DOE
- Bob Vallario U.S. DOE
- Charles Covel, DHS
Modeling Panel: What did we learn this week? What progress can be made on the issues discussed this week?
- Gerry Meehl, NCAR
- Tony Janetos, Boston University (remote)
- Others TBD